See feature article below: Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ: SBUX)
Broad Street Alerts recent profiles and track record, 642% in verifiable potential gains for our members on 3 recent small cap alerts alone!
May 9th, 2016-(NYSE-MKT: MGT) opened at .64/share and hit over $4.15/share within 8 days for potential gains of 548% for our members.
May 23rd, 2016 (NYSE-MKT: XXII) opened at $.78/share and hit $.94/share within 2 days for potential gains of 20% for our members.
May 26th, 2016 (NASDAQ: CETX) opened at $2.00/share and hit $3.50/share within 10 days for potential gains of 74% for our members.
***Get our small cap profiles, special situation and watch alerts in real time. We are now offering our VIP SMS/text alert service for free, simply text the word “Alerts” to the phone number 25827 from your cell phone.
Report For: Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ: SBUX)
Starbucks is being sued for giving me drinks smaller than advertised? They are putting too much ice in their cold drinks? I don’t really want to hear this; it’s like finding out my parents had sex to conceive me. I know it happened, I just don’t want to hear about it. I don’t want anything to interfere with my ability to get a Triple Tall Latte! SBUX shares are up marginally at $55.69 per share.
A federal judge has allowed a lawsuit to move forward alleging that the coffee chain has been underfilling its lattes. In the suit, plaintiffs Siera Strumlauf and Benjamin Robles charge that Starbucks advertises 12-ounce, 16-ounce, and 20-ounce serving sizes, but trains its staff to make the drinks in a way that leaves them 25% short of the advertised amount.
U.S. District Judge Thelton Henderson in San Francisco dismissed Starbucks’ efforts to have the case thrown out. That’s a blow to the coffee chain, which noted in its motion to dismiss that “Plaintiffs lack standing to assert any of their claims for relief because they have not alleged actual injury.”
In the motion, Starbucks said that its drinks meet the standards of “reasonable consumers,” though it did not directly address how it makes its lattes or exactly how much liquid they contain.
What is being charged?
The proposed class action lawsuit, which was first reported by Consumerist, claims that Starbucks baristas use pitchers for heating milk with “fill to” lines that are not high enough. It also claims that they are taught to leave 1/4 inch of free space in each cup for foamed milk. The plaintiffs charge that foamed milk should not count toward the total amount of liquid in the drink.
“Plaintiffs allege that Starbucks lattes are uniformly underfilled using three different theories,” the judge wrote. “First, Plaintiffs assert that the milk foam, which makes up the top layer of the latte, should not be counted toward the total volume of the latte, because according to the ‘food science community’ and the ‘weights and measures community,’ the industry standard is to let the foam dissipate, or to measure the drink without the foam.”
The judge did deny the plaintiffs request for injunctive relief, which could have forced Starbucks to immediately change how it makes or advertises its lattes. In denying that request, he noted that in order to grant an injunction, the lawsuit would have to show that the people involved were likely to be wronged again in a similar way or that they are “threatened with a concrete and particularized legal harm.”
What does this mean for Starbucks?
While the idea of this case may seem silly, the reality is that it could be quite expensive for Starbucks. If the chain loses, in theory it could not only owe damages for customers served underfilled lattes in the past, it could also have to change how it makes the drinks going forward.
In addition to having to change its equipment and train its staff to make lattes in a new way (or modify the advertising of its sizes) Starbucks would also have to actually use more liquid. If the drinks are truly underfilled by 25%, that’s a significant amount of added milk, water, and coffee, which would add to its costs.
Starbucks has continually denied that its drinks are underfilled and made a statement to Consumerist after the judge’s ruling was released.
“We were pleased with the court’s decision to limit the scope of the claims and believe that this lawsuit and the recently filed similar actions are without merit,” a Starbucks spokesperson told the website. “All of our handcrafted beverages are made in accordance with our customers’ preferences. If a customer is not satisfied with their beverage preparation, we will gladly remake it. We will be prepared to defend our case in court.”
The chain is also facing a similar lawsuit which alleges that its cold drinks contain too much ice.
Source – Motley Fool / Daniel Kline
Broadstreetalerts.com is a wholly owned subsidiary of Small Cap Specialists LLC, herein referred to as SCS LLC.
Our reports/releases are a commercial advertisement and are for general information purposes ONLY. We are engaged in the business of marketing and advertising companies for monetary compensation. Never invest in any stock featured on our site or emails unless you can afford to lose your entire investment. The disclaimer is to be read and fully understood before using our services, joining our site or our email/blog list as well as any social networking platforms we may use.
PLEASE NOTE WELL: SCS LLC and its employees are not a Registered Investment Advisor, Broker Dealer or a member of any association for other research providers in any jurisdiction whatsoever.
Release of Liability: Through use of this website viewing or using you agree to hold SCS LLC, its operators owners and employees harmless and to completely release them from any and all liability due to any and all loss (monetary or otherwise), damage (monetary or otherwise), or injury (monetary or otherwise) that you may incur. The information contained herein is based on sources which we believe to be reliable but is not guaranteed by us as being accurate and does not purport to be a complete statement or summary of the available data. SCS LLC encourages readers and investors to supplement the information in these reports with independent research and other professional advice. All information on featured companies is provided by the companies profiled, or is available from public sources and SCS LLC makes no representations, warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of the disclosure by the profiled companies. None of the materials or advertisements herein constitute offers or solicitations to purchase or sell securities of the companies profiled herein and any decision to invest in any such company or other financial decisions should not be made based upon the information provide herein. Instead SCS LLC strongly urges you conduct a complete and independent investigation of the respective companies and consideration of all pertinent risks. Readers are advised to review SEC periodic reports: Forms 10-Q, 10K, Form 8-K, insider reports, Forms 3, 4, 5 Schedule 13D. SCS LLC is compliant with the Can Spam Act of 2003. SCS LLC does not offer such advice or analysis, and SCS LLC further urges you to consult your own independent tax, business, financial and investment advisors. SCS LLC has been compensated twenty thousand dollars cash via bank wire by star media llc for a two day investor relations campaign of STEM. SCS LLC does not hold any positions in STEM. SCS LLC has previously been compensated twenty thousand dollars cash via bank wire by DF Media for the mention of MGT. We do not hold any positions in MGT. Investing in micro-cap and growth securities is highly speculative and carries and extremely high degree of risk. It is possible that an investor’s investment may be lost or impaired due to the speculative nature of the companies profiled. We have not been compensated nor do we own positions in the company/companies that are in the featured article.
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides investors a ‘safe harbor’ in regard to forward-looking statements. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, goals, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact may be “forward looking statements”. Forward looking statements are based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through use of words such as “projects”, “foresee”, “expects”, “will”, “anticipates”, “estimates”, “believes”, “understands”, or that by statements indicating certain actions & quote; “may”, “could”, or “might” occur. Understand there is no guarantee past performance will be indicative of future results.
In preparing this publication, SCS LLC has relied upon information supplied by its customers, publicly available information and press releases which it believes to be reliable; however, such reliability cannot be guaranteed. Investors should not rely on the information contained in this website. Rather, investors should use the information contained in this website as a starting point for doing additional independent research on the featured companies. The advertisements in this website are believed to be reliable, however, SCS LLC and its owners, affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, directors, representatives and agents disclaim any liability as to the completeness or accuracy of the information contained in any advertisement and for any omissions of materials facts from such advertisement. SCS LLC is not responsible for any claims made by the companies advertised herein, nor is SCS LLC responsible for any other promotional firm, its program or its structure.
Please Note: We do NOT accept free trading or restricted securities as payment for our services.
SCS LLC is not affiliated with any exchange, electronic quotation system, the Securities Exchange Commission or FINRA. SCS LLC is not a Broker/Dealer and does not engage in high frequency trading.
Hot small cap stocks
small cap stock picks
FDA approval stocks
Become a day trader
Day trade stocks for a living
PDUFA date set
micro cap stocks
Best stocks 2016
Hottest small cap stocks
Best stock picks
Who to follow for stock picks
Apple news stock picks
Stock picks on apple news